svn commit: r185499 - head
Alfred Perlstein
alfred at freebsd.org
Thu Dec 4 01:57:57 PST 2008
* M. Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> [081201 21:12] wrote:
> In message: <20081201132554.GD27096 at elvis.mu.org>
> Alfred Perlstein <alfred at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : * Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des at des.no> [081201 03:25] wrote:
> : > Tim Kientzle <kientzle at freebsd.org> writes:
> : > > Alfred Perlstein <alfred at freebsd.org> writes:
> : > > > Log:
> : > > > Provide a 'tinderbox' target that compiles enough of FreeBSD that
> : > > > a developer can rest reasonably assured that the tinderbox will not
> : > > > be broken. This target leverages most of 'universe' but will exit
> : > > > non-zero and output a summary at the end.
> : > > > "make tinderbox"
> : > > Excellent!
> : >
> : > I really don't see the point, especially now that 'make universe' will
> : > issue a warning on stdout for every build that fails. As I've tried to
> : > explain to Alfred, the tinderbox does nothing magical, and nothing that
> : > isn't already covered by 'make universe'. I also asked him to discuss
> : > any changes with Poul-Henning before committing them.
> :
> : I'll summarize the changes here:
> :
> : Problems with make universe:
> : 1) Make universe returns success on failure.
> : 2) Make universe outputs the following on failure:
> : --------------------------------------------------------------
> : make universe completed on `LC_ALL=C date`"
> : (started ${STARTTIME})"
> : --------------------------------------------------------------
> :
> : This basically means you can't chain 'make universe' into something
> : like "make tinderbox || (echo oops | mail -s tinderbox failed...)".
> :
> : The summary at the end "completed" is very misleading.
> :
> : The tinderbox target differs as follows:
> :
> : It returns an error if it fails.
> : It outputs a summary of the failures at the end.
> : The name reflects what its for. ("what the heck is a universe?")
> :
> :
> : If you strongly believe that a target should return "true" on failure
> : and/or output "i worked" on failure then I'm not sure how to approach
> : that mindset, maybe you can help me understand where you're coming from
> : on that? Where is the utility in it? Is there something I'm missing?
>
> I think you ignored the discussions that said that 'universe' should
> be modified to exit with an error when there was an error, but
> shouldn't bail out EARLY. There were even patches to do this.
Interesting, I didn't see them and they weren't committed.
The owner/maintainer of universe hasn't really stepped up to
provide anything and ask me "hey Alfred, would this be helpful?"
and the owner/maintainer of tinderbox has not either.
Mostly the two of them have told me "you do it, or shut up", so I
did it.
> Based on that, why do something completely new and different?
New and different? What?
Maybe you can explain to me what's so earth shattering new and
different about having a make target behave like most any other
sane make target and have a name that is self-documenting?
There is a 'tinderbox' target, which is named so that when someone
says "gee, I wonder how to satisfy the tinderbox" they do not need
to read a wiki, blog, handbook, manpage, check IRC, news group
or mailing list archive to figure out, they can just run it and
get something that makes sense.
Anyhow, I don't really care what's done so as long as there's a
top level target that does what I just committed, so if someone wants
to redo how I did what I did in order to get the exact same results
they can be my guest.
I would hope that they have better things to do though.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list