svn commit: r568012 - head/net/tightvnc

[Mathieu Arnold]

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:04:27AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2021, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > You don't need approval from anyone, there is already a blanket approval
> > for:
> > 
> > * Most infrastructure changes to a port (that is, modernizing, but not
> >   changing the functionality). For example, the blanket covers
> >   converting to new `USES` macros, enabling verbose builds, and
> >   switching to new ports system syntaxes.
> 
> I wasn't sure whether anyone might yell at me if I simply change the 
> infrastructure like this and then adjust all affected ports. ;-)
> 
> Now I went ahead and de facto made USE_GCC=any equivalent to USE_GCC=yes.
> Next I plan on updating all ports still featuring USE_GCC=any, and finally
> completely remove reference to "any" from Mk/bsd.gcc.mk.
> 
> Thanks for your guidance/support.

Thank you for working on this.

You may want to add checks for USE_GCC=any in bsd.sanity.mk so that if
anyone adds it again, they get an error right away.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20210530/47b9225a/attachment.sig>