svn commit: r568012 - head/net/tightvnc

[Mathieu Arnold]

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:27:41PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> I understood it as "let's delete all USE_GCC=any and see what breaks", not as "let's replace USE_GCC=any with USE_GCC=yes".

No, I specifically said, let's try and see what happens if USE_GCC=any
does nothing, see what can now build with clang, then move from
USE_GCC=any to yes for what can't.

> If it's the latter, I'm ok with it.
> 
> On 21-03-17 15:16:44, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > > I know what you mean and this will just make more work for people
> > > caring about ARM / PPC.
> > 
> > Well IMHO the question is not whether to delete all uses of USE_GCC;
> > it's the particular string value "any" and replacing it with something
> > else.
> > 
> > mcl



-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20210317/2b6e8cbc/attachment.sig>