svn commit: r568012 - head/net/tightvnc

Mathieu Arnold mat at freebsd.org
Wed Mar 17 13:41:22 UTC 2021


On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:54:42PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> On 21-03-17 12:45:07, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:13:17PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > > First step could probably be to make a patch for `any` mean `yes`,
> > > build stuff and look at the size of the explosion from afar.
> > 
> > After a second thought, the first step could probably have USE_GCC=any
> > do nothing and see what does not explode.
> > 
>
> Don't do that, it will break the ports that specifically need GCC (like net/tightvnc).
> 
> The better way would be making it work like USE_GCC=yes.

What I said was start with having USE_GCC=any do nothing, to see what
ports still work, so those can loose the USE_GCC, then for the rest,
convert to from any to yes.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20210317/ab3033b9/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list