svn commit: r531474 - in head/net: . samba411 samba411/files samba411/files/man

Adam Weinberger adamw at adamw.org
Wed Apr 15 00:02:36 UTC 2020


On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:40 PM Matthias Andree <mandree at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> [corrected one word]
>
> Am 14.04.20 um 15:47 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:45:39PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:42:42PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 02:00:35AM +0000, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> >>>> New Revision: 531474
> >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/531474
> >>>>
> >>>> Log:
> >>>>   Add new Samba 4.11 port
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for trying to work on FreeBSD ports, now, this needs to be
> >>> added with a svn cp of a previous version.  Please remove this and add
> >>> it properly.
> >>
> >> This probably applies to `databases/ldb20' as well (r530544).  I've
> >> pinged Timur, but never heard back.
> >
> > Best would probably to remove those ports in the mean time.
>
> I'll call that recommendation "damaging" because nobody has shown how
> the resulting package were broken. So why should a - CORRECTION -
> working - END CORRECTION - port be taken
> away from ports users again, with MOVED churn, repo churn and whatnot?
>
> Other than for a blind ambition of trying to get the last bit of
> metadata correct that bears no *practical* relevance, there is none.
> It's a waste of time and must stop.

Thanks for weighing in.

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
adamw at adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list