svn commit: r506850 - head/databases/mysql-connector-odbc

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:48:24PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:42:36PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:17:09PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> > > Ah, I didn't know it existed.
> > > 
> > > But C++0x is still the same as C++11...
> > 
> > *sigh*
> > 
> > Yes, their effect is the same (both would pull the same compiler),
> > but it gives the reader false impression that the code is C++11 while
> > it's C++0x.
> 
> C++11 is literally the-standard-formerly-known-as-C++0x.  To the extent
> that there are deviations, it's because the compiler is referring to
> some (probably unstated and inconsistent) draft.

While I agree that C++11 is essentially a gold-release version of C++0x,
I was trying to make a larger point here, that is, do not blindly use
`c++11-lang' or `c11' whenever a modern compiler is required and try to
do something more appropriate in each particular case.

./danfe