svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:35:14AM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> ...
> Yes the process is not well understood by all, but this is a natural
> outcome of people avoiding the process, because its not entirely clear
> what the point is, because the messaging has been unclear from the
> start. We still have veteren developers asking what should and shouldn't
> be merged. This is the most obvious sign of a knowledge and/or
> expectations gap.

The correct way out of this mess is what had been said before on numerous
occasion: stable/security/quarterly branches should be operated by ports-
secteam@ or however it's called, not by the individual committers.  This
would solve *all* the problems of what and how to merge because dedicated
team would know better and coordinate its action only within itself.

./danfe