svn commit: r456527 - in head/databases: . postgis20 postgis21 postgis22 postgis23 postgis24

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:25:43PM +0100, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
> On 12/17/17 12:41, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0000, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
> >> New Revision: 456527
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/456527
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>    Add new port postgis24 for v2.4.x
> >>
> >> Added:
> >>    head/databases/postgis24/
> >>    head/databases/postgis24/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
> >>    head/databases/postgis24/distinfo   (contents, props changed)
> >>    head/databases/postgis24/pkg-descr   (contents, props changed)
> >>    head/databases/postgis24/pkg-install   (contents, props changed)
> >>    head/databases/postgis24/pkg-plist   (contents, props changed)
> >
> > Looks like it should've been repocopied, not added as a new port.
> > Can you explain why this wasn't done?
> 
> I don't get your question, do you see any issue regarding postgis24 port?

I have an issue not with the port per se, but with the way it was carried
out (added to the collection).  Please read Section 19.4* of the Ports
Committer's Guide, albeit I'm surprised that your mentor did not tell you
about it earlier.

If you're subscribed to svn-ports-* ML (like you should), you would have
also known about this procedure, it's not something uncommon.

./danfe

*) https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#ports-qa-repocopies