svn commit: r439346 - in head/graphics: . gcolor3

[Tobias Kortkamp]

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017, at 12:37, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:23:17PM +0200, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017, at 03:13, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:08:50PM +0000, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > > > Author: tobik
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/439346
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > >   New port: graphics/gcolor3
> > > > ...
> > > > Added:
> > > >   head/graphics/gcolor3/
> > > > ...
> > > > --- head/graphics/Makefile	Mon Apr 24 20:23:23 2017	(r439345)
> > > > +++ head/graphics/Makefile	Mon Apr 24 21:08:50 2017	(r439346)
> > > > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@
> > > >      SUBDIR += gbm
> > > >      SUBDIR += gcolor
> > > >      SUBDIR += gcolor2
> > > > +    SUBDIR += gcolor3
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't it had been repocopied from `graphics/gcolor2'?
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> It was a question; several gcolorX ports suggest that they might be
> related
> (major branches of the same codebase).  If those are independent,
> repocopy
> rule probably does not apply, albeit seeing three *unrelated*
> foobar{1,2,3}
> ports is weird.
> 
> ./danfe
> 

AFAICT the codebases are independent of each other.  Judging by
gcolor3's commit history it's a cleanroom reimplementation of gcolor2
in Gtk+ 3.0 and they don't share a codebase.