svn commit: r438592 - in head/www/nginx-devel: . files

Sergey A. Osokin osa at FreeBSD.org
Sun Apr 16 00:57:29 UTC 2017


On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 06:36:15PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:18 +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 04:31:43PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 21:40 +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 01:47:13PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 21:32 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > > > > > Le 15/04/2017 ? 19:39, Sergey A. Osokin a ?crit :
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Author: osa
> > > > > > > Date: Sat Apr 15 17:39:35 2017
> > > > > > > New Revision: 438592
> > > > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/438592
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Log:
> > > > > > >   Remove IPV6 knob, IPv6 now compiled-in automatically if
> > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > is found.
> > > > > > >   
> > > > > > Does this mean that if I build the package on a host without
> > > > > > IPv6, it
> > > > > > gets disabled and I don't get IPv6 support where I install
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > package ?
> > > > > Even worse, if I build the package on a system with IPV6
> > > > > enabled I
> > > > > will
> > > > > be unable to build the package with it disabled,
> > > > Not true, It's possible to build an nginx package without IPv6 on
> > > > a
> > > > system
> > > > with IPv6 enabled, please see http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/a6d11
> > > > 6645
> > > > c51
> > > > for details.
> > > But you removed the IPV6 knob rather than adapting it to the new
> > > way
> > > upstream provides for en/disabling it.  How does that enable me to
> > > build without ipv6 support?
> > No problem:
> > 
> > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/www/nginx-devel}
> > CONFIGURE_ARGS+="--with-cc-opt=\"-DNGX_HAVE_INET6=0\""
> > .endif
> > 
> > Not tested yet.
> >  
> 
> 151 ports currently define "IPV6" as the option for controlling ipv6
> support.  There is, of course, no simple way to count how many control
> it using some other mechanism, but I guess whatever that number was,
> it's now +1.

Every port is unique, that's true.

-- 
Sergey A. Osokin
osa at FreeBSD.org


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list