svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs
Mathieu Arnold
mat at mat.cc
Sat Apr 1 22:01:30 UTC 2017
Le 01/04/2017 à 23:58, Jan Beich a écrit :
> Mathieu Arnold <mat at mat.cc> writes:
>
>> Le 01/04/2017 à 22:20, Cy Schubert a écrit :
>>
>>> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592 at repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitch
>>> write
>>> s:
>>>> Author: junovitch
>>>> Date: Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016
>>>> New Revision: 416439
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter
>>>>
>>>> PR: 209976
>>>> Submitted by: DuÅ¡an VejnoviÄ <freebsd at dussan.org>
>>> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request? It
>>> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a patch was
>>> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy changed?
>> The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well,
>> they do.
> Where is this policy documented? I'm sure I've made the same mistake
> more than once in the past.
I'm not sure it penciled down, we try to not commit only maintainer
changes, but require patches that actually update the port.
--
Mathieu Arnold
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list