svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs

[Mathieu Arnold]

Le 01/04/2017 à 22:20, Cy Schubert a écrit :
> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592 at repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitch 
> write
> s:
>> Author: junovitch
>> Date: Sun Jun  5 22:50:04 2016
>> New Revision: 416439
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439
>>
>> Log:
>>   sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter
>>   
>>   PR:		209976
>>   Submitted by:	Dušan Vejnovič <freebsd at dussan.org>
>>
>> Modified:
>>   head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile
>>
>> Modified: head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile
>> =============================================================================
>> =
>> --- head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile	Sun Jun  5 22:38:48 2016
>> 	(r416438)
>> +++ head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile	Sun Jun  5 22:50:04 2016
>> 	(r416439)
>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ MASTER_SITES=	http://tuxera.com/opensour
>>  PKGNAMEPREFIX=	fusefs-
>>  DISTNAME=	${PORTNAME}-3g_ntfsprogs-${PORTVERSION}
>>  
>> -MAINTAINER=	ports at FreeBSD.org
>> +MAINTAINER=	freebsd at dussan.org
>>  COMMENT=	Mount NTFS partitions (read/write) and disk images
>>  
>>  LICENSE=	GPLv2
>>
>>
> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request? It 
> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a patch was 
> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy changed?

The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well,
they do.

> There have been updates posted by the upline over the past 14 months but no 
> updates to the port. I'd like to update the port.

Open a PR with the patch, and wait for the maintainer to either approve
it or 14 days to timeout.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold