svn commit: r415078 - in head: . Mk

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:11:12AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 21 May, 2016, at 10:29, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 02:25:22PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> Implementing it as a Makefile variable would make it not automatically
> >> updated.
> > 
> > Even if we can agree on REP_TIMESTAMP variable, why `make makesum' cannot
> > sed -i the Makefile?
> 
> Oh god, please, no. Please do not mess with Makefiles.
> 
> Rather than having it come from 'makesum', can an svn hook write it to
> distinfo? May help it stay more current.

I understand your worries, but SVN already messes with Makefiles (keywords).
On the other hand, adding $Id$ to distinfo would both 1) solve the problem,
at least as I see it now, and 2) won't mix data with metadata which is I'm
debating against.

Baptiste, was adding $Id$ to distinfo considered/tested?  If yes, why was it
rejected?

./danfe