svn commit: r415588 - head/devel/etcd

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:33:51AM +0100, Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote:
> > On 21 May 2016, at 11:29, Mathieu Arnold <mat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > +--On 21 mai 2016 09:59:57 +0000 Bartek Rutkowski <robak at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > | @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
> > | -TIMESTAMP = 1463262689
> > | -SHA256 (coreos-etcd-v2.3.4_GH0.tar.gz) =
> > | c08f68c3d21929ed3683fe94acefcd871bb3c4339117e745033bf2fb990966a9 -SIZE
> > | (coreos-etcd-v2.3.4_GH0.tar.gz) = 2208416
> > | +SHA256 (coreos-etcd-v2.3.5_GH0.tar.gz) =
> > | a20f73c81c5fac6e99a69e7629a3b89857a5bc5b4b24075b9191194b64a8d49c +SIZE
> > | (coreos-etcd-v2.3.5_GH0.tar.gz) = 2208972
> > 
> > I'm sorry, but why was the TIMESTAMP line removed instead of being
> > updated?
> 
> I havent seen any announcement about this TIMESTAMP thing, nor there is
> any information in the UPDATING, so I thought its some half-baked
> work-in-progress, therefore I am removing it from my distfiles, when it
> sneaks in.

+1.

> Note, I am not doing it as any form of 'disagreement' or having anything
> against it, but simply due to lack of any information what that thing is.

And I *am* disagreeing on it.  Instead of asking people why do they remove
it from their ports' distinfo how about we turn back to a normal technical
discussion on the matter first?  To me it's far from settled.

./danfe