svn commit: r382341 - in head/lang: gcc46 gcc47 gcc48 gcc49 gcc5

[John Marino]

On 3/26/2015 21:46, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/26/2015 3:36 PM, John Marino wrote:
>> Author: marino
>> Date: Thu Mar 26 20:36:04 2015
>> New Revision: 382341
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/382341
>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r382341/
>>
>> Log:
>>   lang/gcc(46,47,48,49,5): Use OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_DragonFly to block JAVA
>>   
>>   The JAVA frontend doesn't build on DragonFly on any release.  The new
>>   OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_${OPSYS} feature is a nice way to avoid the use of
>>   Makefile.DragonFly (most are in dports, but one is in lang/gcc5).
>>   
>>   The recent addition of CXXFLAGS to lang/gcc5 prevents Makefile.DragonFly
>>   on lang/gcc5 from being removed outright.  There are a couple of options
>>   available to allow its removal, but I'll need to discuss with Gerald.
>>   
>>   Approved by:	DragonFly blanket
>>
> 
> 
> Why do you ignore all feedback? I find this as grounds for removal of
> commit bit.
> 
> Why do DragonFly hacks belong in FreeBSD Ports? Not even DragonFly uses
> FreeBSD Ports, it uses dports. So why can these hacks not be in dports?

Please take these threats offline.
Your "feedback" directly conflicts with permission I've been given.
If you want to kick me out as I'm coming up on 2000 commits, that
majority which have been directly beneficial to FreeBSD, then discuss it
with portmgr and do what you must.

John