svn commit: r381760 - in head/x11-fonts/sourcesanspro-ttf: . files

[Bryan Drewery]

On 3/21/15 10:31 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 09:20:59AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 21 Mar, 2015, at 9:03, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>> DISTFILE_DEST, while looking good at the first glance, raises at least
>>> some important questions of its own: how do we mirror these files?  What
>>> should be their mtime, so mirrors won't have to refetch the same bits all
>>> over again?  Do we need/want to maintain relationship between upstream
>>> and our DISTFILE_DEST'ied name, and how do we do it if we do?
>>
>> Those are really good points. I guess if distfiles were stored on
>> MASTER_SITE_BACKUP in a /${UNIQUENAME}/ subdir they could continue to be
>> named what they're originally named. That way the relationship is that
>> things on MASTER_SITE* are the original name, and it's only on the client
>> machine that the distfiles are renamed.
>
> Basically, to deal with unversioned tarballs and Documentation.pdf files we
> had a solution for years: DIST_SUBDIR.  I'd be glad to have something more
> robust, but don't see good alternative ATM.  Even if try to transfer mtime
> of the original badly-named distfile to DISTFILE_DEST, this already smells
> weird. :(
>
> Since right now we seem to be talking about GH mostly, I hope Bryan et al.
> can find a way to deal with it without having to bring in some disruptive
> changes to our framework.
>
> ./danfe
>

I believe USE_GITHUB is fine as is now. The files are uniquely named 
with the new framework.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery