svn commit: r391493 - head/cad/tkgate

Vsevolod Stakhov vsevolod at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jul 7 10:40:41 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/07/2015 11:34, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Jul 2015, at 11:29, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod at FreeBSD.org>
> wrote:
>> 
>> With this logic being enabled, we would have different runtime
>> dependencies for different FreeBSD versions
> 
> This is already the case for iconv and was previously the case for
> other libraries that eventually had their functionality appear in
> libc.
> 
> David
> 

I'm trying to say that's it's a bad practice to prefer base system
dependencies for the ports software. By nature, the ports are the
rolling release of software where we have the most recent versions of
software. Isn't it sane to prefer dependencies on the software
installed from the ports as well? This would also allow to upgrade
software easily (including security fixes, for example). I'm merely
thinking about users experiences here.

- -- 
Vsevolod Stakhov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3v9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list