svn commit: r402813 - head/misc/astrolog

John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st
Fri Dec 4 12:47:31 UTC 2015


On 12/4/2015 1:32 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> Dear John,
> "we" all know that using word "we" in such context ("We know what you
> really meant") is "whole collective force vs. just single person"
> undisguised manipulation. ("it doesn't take a mind reader") Admitting
> ability of mind reading even without using specific mind read skills
> confirms your haughtily attitude even more.

Should we take a poll?
What percentage of the people would have to agree with my interpretation
for you to concur it's how the majority would interpret it?

> ("and if the unpleasantness") All unpleasant in this conversation is not
> your position about the ports, it can rightfully exist among other
> positions, with agreement or disagreement from others, it is normal, but
> only your superego-style to handle communications (f.e. by accusing me
> of dirty tricks of changing my words meaning), this is not productive
> and not acceptable.
> I may disagree with your position, but I admit it is consistent and have
> its place. But I can't accept anybody attempting to speak with me in
> such tone with insulting assumptions on any subject and need a little
> bit of respect to feel pleasant.

Yet you feel it's okay to insinuate that I internal (mental) issues in
the course of the discussion.  Oh, ok.  Hypocritical much?

> So I prefer to stay away of speaking with you for a while not on this
> subject only, but on all other subjects too until this situation will be
> changed, I hope.
> Sincerely yours,
> 

It was over.
Don't forgot who started how it started.


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list