svn commit: r349288 - head/archivers/ocaml-bz2

[John Marino]

On 3/26/2014 23:26, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:17 PM, John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> wrote:
>> On 3/26/2014 21:18, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>>> Author: antoine
>>> Date: Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014
>>> New Revision: 349288
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/349288
>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r349288/
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   Stage support
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>   head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile
>>>
>>> Modified: head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile Wed Mar 26 20:09:29 2014        (r349287)
>>> +++ head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014        (r349288)
>>> @@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ DISTNAME=  caml${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
>>>  MAINTAINER=  jaapb at kerguelen.org
>>>  COMMENT=     OCaml library to manipulate bz2 files
>>>
>>> +DESTDIRNAME= DONTUSEIT
>>>  GNU_CONFIGURE=       yes
>>>  USES=                gmake
>>> -NO_STAGE=    yes
>>> -
>>
>> You left USE_OCAML_LDCONFIG=     yes.
>> Won't this create an ldconf file that will get added to plist and will
>> conflict potentially with the real ldconf?
>>
>> USE_OCAML_WASH is also set.  Is this knob actually desireable?  Why is
>> it needed if it's competing with pkg to remove files?
>>
>> I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just trying to learn this.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I modifed bsd.ocaml.mk so now USE_OCAML_LDCONFIG doesn't violate
> stagedir anymore.
> 
> For USE_OCAML_WASH,  I have doubts on its usefulness, maybe it should
> be garbage collected in all the tree.

Hi Antoine,
I suspect that ldconf modifications have to happen at a post-install
step after the package is extracted.  This probably needs rework and
somebody to figure it out.

If you aren't packaging ldconf, then it's not doing anything (which
means its not conflicting either, but there's no point to it)

John