svn commit: r348593 - head/devel/p5-RPSL-Parser

[Andrej Zverev]

Well, I don't know how it is now, but quick search showed at least
this record from previous generation of ports managers and it look
reasonable: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-July/025022.html
. Maybe it even documented somewhere, but i don't know exact url.



On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 3/18/2014 3:44 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> +--On 18 mars 2014 20:11:26 +0000 Ryan Steinmetz <zi at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> | Author: zi
>> | Date: Tue Mar 18 20:11:26 2014
>> | New Revision: 348593
>> | URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/348593
>> | QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r348593/
>> |
>> | Log:
>> |   - Do not try to remove %%SITE_PERL%%/%%PERL_ARCH%%/auto or
>> | %%SITE_PERL%%/%%PERL_ARCH%%
>>
>> You forgot to change the MAINTAINER back to you too.
>>
>
> I really have no skin in this, but from my perspective this seems normal.
>
> There's 1983 ports in perl@ right now. Before I reset ports involving
> teams I check to see how many are already in the alias. In perl's case I
> would also give it to perl at .
>
> The lang/perl* ports were not maintained by perl@ until "r316226 | bapt
> | 2013-04-22 07:40:10". So what was the purpose of the team if not to
> maintain the main perl ports?
>
> I think this discussion should move to perl@, and as a team you should
> come to a consensus and document it on your wiki. And if it is to not
> have these ports maintained by perl@, the majority of them should
> probably be reset to ports at .
>
> --
> Regards,
> Bryan Drewery
>