svn commit: r347936 - in head: . japanese japanese/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin japanese/spamassassin mail mail/claws-mail-spamassassin mail/evolution mail/exim mail/isbg mail/mailscanner mail/mimedefang m...

[Adam Weinberger]

On March 12, 2014 9:06:43 AM EDT, Mathieu Arnold <mat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>+--On 12 mars 2014 07:46:05 -0500 Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at FreeBSD.org>
>wrote:
>| On 3/11/2014 9:56 PM, Andrej Zverev wrote:
>|> I think since p5-Mail-SA has a long history in ports tree, you
>|> (can/need/good idea) also send short annonce of such changes to
>|> port-announce@ and ports@ maillists.
>| 
>| No, MOVED is sufficient. We never send ports@ or ports-announce@ for
>| renamed origins. Even UPDATING is not conventional in this case.
>
>MOVED is not sufficient, people using binary packages only will have to
>guess what they should do when pkg upgrade tells them they have a
>conflict.

Ahh I see what you mean.

Would
    pkg set -o mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin:mail/spamassassin
solve the problem for binary pkg users?

# Adam

-- 
Adam Weinberger
adamw at adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org