svn commit: r315126 - in head/net: . tigervnc tigervnc/files

[Bryan Drewery]

On 3/24/2013 11:34 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
>> On 3/24/2013 10:05 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
>>> +USE_CMAKE=	yes
>>
>> See CHANGES 20130319. Should now use USES=cmake
> 
> Done, but I'm not sure why. I looked at the stuff in CHANGES about USES
> and couldn't see why one is better than the other. Is there some
> documentation I'm missing.

Thanks!

> 
> And wouldn't you prefer if portlint had warned me about this when I used
> it, rather than having to send these out by hand? I know I would certainly
> rather do it right the first time than get called out for doing it wrong.
> 

I agree we should put things in portlint that should not be done.

However in this case the compatibility is being removed in ports/177356.
With the other USES conversions in b.p.m. the compatibility was removed
right away, which would have revealed itself here as a build failure.

> Steve
> 


-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery at freenode/EFNet

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20130324/423ca728/attachment.sig>