svn commit: r335728 - head/benchmarks/bonnie++

[Ganael LAPLANCHE]

On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:22:10 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote

> Since these bit-stirring changes inside the binary are hardly 
> user-visible, yes, I think it was an overkill.  But it does 
> not hurt, of course.  I just do not like to rebuild things for 
> no real reason.  I mean, if user is happy with installed 
> package (built with gcc46), why force him/her to rebuilt it 
> just for the sake of using different compiler?

Of course I fully understand we want to avoid re-building software when
it is not needed, but the fact that a same package version can embed
different binaries bothers me, that's why I decided to bump the
PORTREVISION.

My original thought was more about being able to identify that this
compiler has been used to produce that specific package version. But as
any version of Gcc can be used in this case, this was probably meanless.

Cheers,

--
Ganael LAPLANCHE <ganael.laplanche at martymac.org>
http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org
FreeBSD: martymac <martymac at FreeBSD.org>, http://www.FreeBSD.org