svn commit: r335281 - in head: . audio audio/gnump3d

John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st
Mon Dec 2 13:58:35 UTC 2013


On 12/2/2013 14:49, Philippe Audéoud wrote:
> 
> Ok, just calm down, every thing gonne be all right... I didn't challenge
> him, but I won't debate anymore, you don't look to be opened to a
> debate.
> 
> My personal think is : I was on week-end and i don't use computer on
> week-end. I guess this delete commit could wait 2 days.


Why should it?  It was the date you defined.
Rene is right to assume that the port maintainer isn't intending to
delete the port in a timely fashion because it almost never happens.
Your desire to delete the port yourself on the expiration date is
exceptional.


>>
>> This is the situation today.  My position is that this is a bad policy.
>>  I say we should not have to wait 2 weeks to unbreak a port and your
>> response is "wait up to 2 weeks to unbreak a port".  Perhaps I
>> misunderstood you, but that's what I understood.
>>
> 
> And, if rules are not good, i break them? I disagree with highway code,
> and i should break it only because i'm not aware?


You are misrepresenting me.  I follow the rules, but they are crappy
rules so I'm complaining about them.  Rene did not break any rules that
I am aware of.  (You conveniently did not show me where this "rule" is
documented, nor why you think port maintenance privilege extends past
the expire deadline).



> I'm not protective with my ports, I'm just applying rules. You can be
> disagree with rules but before breaking them and do what you want, you
> should talk to portmgr@ to change that.
> 
> And as you seem to have free time to mail on a wrong place debate, you
> should:
> 1- mail portmgr@ with your opinion and ask them to change current rules.
> 2- give a hand on closing PR for freebsd-port-bugs


To iterate: Nobody has broken any rules.  What "rule" did Rene or I
break?  To whom are you referring?

what does #2 have to do with anything?  That is total random.

I assume any active portmgr@ will see this thread.  I don't need to
rehash it, not do I need to start simultaneous issues with them (I have
one pending already).

Hint: If you don't respond, I'll stop responding too.  :)


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list