svn commit: r337346 - branches/2014Q1/audio/ardour/files

Alexey Dokuchaev danfe at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 24 16:48:34 UTC 2013


On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:18:51PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 24 dц╘cembre 2013 13:50:24 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org>
> | IMHO it should've been committed as part of r337343.  There is nothing
> | wrong with separating complicated fix into several commits (in head/),
> | but if they are related, it makes more sense to merge them together, no?
> 
> Yes, I could have done that, but the mfh script doesn't take more than one
> revision to merge at a time, and I did not notice until after the facts
> that there were two commits to the same port.
> 
> If the original committer had asked for the merge, had gotten approval, and
> had done it himself, he sure would have done it like you said ;-)

Hehe, fair enough.  As someone who was against branching the Ports Tree, my
initial feeling was "fine, folks want to play with their new toy, why would
I care?", hence I did not even check quarterly branch out.  Perhaps I will
reconsider, but hardly before I fix all my ports in head/.

./danfe

P.S.  It would still be nice to have that script fixed though. ;-)


More information about the svn-ports-branches mailing list