svn commit: r550188 - head/print/harfbuzz

Jan Beich jbeich at FreeBSD.org
Sat Sep 26 15:02:01 UTC 2020


"Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner at FreeBSD.org> writes:

>   There are minor differences in the tarballs.
>   
>   Bump revision to ensure consistency.

As long as the produced package is the same there was no point in
forcing users to rebuild it via PORTREVISION bump. In poudriere
this also implies rebuilding all consumers.

> -PORTREVISION?=	0
> +PORTREVISION?=	1

Did you mean to bump only master but not slave ports?

$ fgrep PORTREVISION print/harfbuzz-*/Makefile
print/harfbuzz-hb-view/Makefile:PORTREVISION=   0
print/harfbuzz-icu/Makefile:PORTREVISION=       0

> +MASTER_SITES=	https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/releases/download/${DISTVERSION}/

Why not replace harfbuzz with ${PORTNAME}, so MASTER_SITES is generic?


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list