svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:16:47 +0200 Mathieu Arnold <mat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
>> On 02.07.19 12:23, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>> Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur at bat.ru> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>> Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port.
>>>>>
>>>>> It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution, as I
>>>>> said even fedora is on the legacy
>>>>>
>>>> I've committed net/samba410.
>>>>
>>>> My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use
>>>> devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep
>>>> using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't happen,
>>>> API still should remain
>>>> the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Python27,
>>>> as far as I can see.
>>> 
>>> So, branching 2019Q2 is now a day late.
>>> When are you going to fix the issue?
>> 
>> Mat, is this the reason the branch is late? If so: have you considered
>> branching from r504589?
> 
> It is being considered, yes, as a last resort kind of thing. timur@ has
> had 13 days to fix the problem, I hope he is getting close to fixing it
> all.

It's probably time to introduce some sort of a soft freeze where no
major changes are allowed (unless approved by portmgr) in the last two
weeks or so of the quarter.  It's not just samba, x11@ moving the mesa
ports to llvm80 on the last day of the quarter is also way too close.