svn commit: r490457 - in head: . www www/wml www/wml/files

[Mathieu Arnold]

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:45:12PM +0000, Vinícius Zavam wrote:
> Am Di., 22. Jan. 2019 um 15:48 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Arnold <mat at freebsd.org>:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:34:38PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:59 PM Vinícius Zavam <egypcio at freebsd.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am Mi., 16. Jan. 2019 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Arnold <
> > mat at freebsd.org>:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:56:37AM +0000, Vinícius Zavam wrote:
> > > >> > Author: egypcio
> > > >> > Date: Wed Jan 16 08:56:37 2019
> > > >> > New Revision: 490457
> > > >> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/490457
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Log:
> > > >> >   [REVIVE PORT] www/wml: The WML, 2.0.12
> > > >> >
> > > >> >     Some websites are still using WML, https://torproject.org is
> > one of them.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >     svn copy made against head/www/wml r437070
> > > >>
> > > >> Mmmm, saying it does not make it so, the commit has not registered the
> > > >> copy.  Could you please do it again but with actually doing the svn
> > cp.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Mathieu Arnold
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hi mat@, how are you doing?
> > > >
> > > > the initial work to revive this port was started with a repo copy,
> > based on head/www/wml at 437070. the diff for www/wml needed to be reworked
> > some times, and turned to be just a 'regular' patch file uploaded to
> > phabricator - version was kept the same, revision was bumped.
> > > >
> > > > what do you mean by 'not registered copy' ? now the approved version
> > of it is already in ports/head and the diferential was closed.
> > >
> > > The commit itself needs to be copied from the deleted version. Have a
> > > read through
> > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#ports-qa-re-adding
> > > and once you're ready, speak up if you want a hand with it.
> >
> > Ping.
> >
> > --
> > Mathieu Arnold
> >
> 
> hey, hello everyone. many thanks for the extra input! very appreciated.
> 
> right now I can not stop high-prio things here and work this change as fast
> as you might like me to, so it will be 'on hold' on my TODO list - and I
> really would love to do it right, without any damages to the tree or
> whatever it relates to (yes, I will maybe need an extra hand though).

ping.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20190204/bf4d1d87/attachment.sig>