svn commit: r484872 - head/mail/neomutt

Pietro Cerutti gahr at FreeBSD.org
Wed Nov 14 09:19:49 UTC 2018


On Nov 13 2018, 22:28 UTC, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:54 AM Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com> wrote:
>>
>> In message <201811131059.wADAxKfx094892 at repo.freebsd.org>, Pietro
>> Cerutti write
>> s:
>> > Author: gahr
>> > Date: Tue Nov 13 10:59:19 2018
>> > New Revision: 484872
>> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/484872
>> >
>> > Log:
>> >   mail/neomutt: add support for GSSAPI, by default using krb from base
>> >
>> >   Approved by:        bapt
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> >   head/mail/neomutt/Makefile
>> >
>> > Modified: head/mail/neomutt/Makefile
>> > =============================================================================
>> > =
>> > --- head/mail/neomutt/Makefile        Tue Nov 13 10:53:03 2018        (r48487
>> > 1)
>> > +++ head/mail/neomutt/Makefile        Tue Nov 13 10:59:19 2018        (r48487
>> > 2)
>> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>> >
>> >  PORTNAME=    neomutt
>> >  PORTVERSION= 20180716
>> > -PORTREVISION=        1
>> > +PORTREVISION=        2
>> >  DISTVERSIONPREFIX=   ${PORTNAME}-
>> >  CATEGORIES=  mail
>> >
>> > @@ -26,11 +26,12 @@ OPTIONS_SUB=      yes
>> >  SHEBANG_FILES=       contrib/smime_keys
>> >
>> >  OPTIONS_DEFINE=      NLS DOCS SASL IDN FLOCK GPGME NOTMUCH
>> > -OPTIONS_DEFAULT=SASL TOKYOCABINET NOTMUCH GPGME LMDB NCURSES
>> > +OPTIONS_DEFAULT=SASL TOKYOCABINET NOTMUCH GPGME LMDB NCURSES GSSAPI_BASE
>>
>> One of my todos, which I'm currently working on, during the first step
>> of replacing Heimdal in base with MIT is to make kerberos in base
>> private. Nothing will be able to link to it. I've been working through
>> and fixed all ports issues identified by an exp-run (though openssl111
>> has given me more work). Which would you like to have as a default in a
>> post private kerberos base world? (I've tentatively set it to MIT in my
>> git tree.)
>
>If FreeBSD is choosing MIT over Heimdal in base, then it seems to me
>that we should choose MIT over Heimdal in ports, no?

If a port is using base-Heimdal, then it seems to me that it should 
switch to using ports-Heimdal, no?

-- 
Pietro Cerutti
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 898 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20181114/fb24b71f/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list