svn commit: r484872 - head/mail/neomutt
Cy Schubert
Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com
Tue Nov 13 22:41:11 UTC 2018
In message <CAP7rwcirw8X1r8JEhxo=HUPis0OE6dHhVmoO7mVdTowhzNj=OQ at mail.gma
il.com>
, Adam Weinberger writes:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:54 AM Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com> wrot
> e:
> >
> > In message <201811131059.wADAxKfx094892 at repo.freebsd.org>, Pietro
> > Cerutti write
> > s:
> > > Author: gahr
> > > Date: Tue Nov 13 10:59:19 2018
> > > New Revision: 484872
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/484872
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > mail/neomutt: add support for GSSAPI, by default using krb from base
> > >
> > > Approved by: bapt
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > > head/mail/neomutt/Makefile
> > >
> > > Modified: head/mail/neomutt/Makefile
> > > =========================================================================
> ====
> > > =
> > > --- head/mail/neomutt/Makefile Tue Nov 13 10:53:03 2018 (r4
> 8487
> > > 1)
> > > +++ head/mail/neomutt/Makefile Tue Nov 13 10:59:19 2018 (r4
> 8487
> > > 2)
> > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> > >
> > > PORTNAME= neomutt
> > > PORTVERSION= 20180716
> > > -PORTREVISION= 1
> > > +PORTREVISION= 2
> > > DISTVERSIONPREFIX= ${PORTNAME}-
> > > CATEGORIES= mail
> > >
> > > @@ -26,11 +26,12 @@ OPTIONS_SUB= yes
> > > SHEBANG_FILES= contrib/smime_keys
> > >
> > > OPTIONS_DEFINE= NLS DOCS SASL IDN FLOCK GPGME NOTMUCH
> > > -OPTIONS_DEFAULT=SASL TOKYOCABINET NOTMUCH GPGME LMDB NCURSES
> > > +OPTIONS_DEFAULT=SASL TOKYOCABINET NOTMUCH GPGME LMDB NCURSES GSSAPI_BASE
> >
> > One of my todos, which I'm currently working on, during the first step
> > of replacing Heimdal in base with MIT is to make kerberos in base
> > private. Nothing will be able to link to it. I've been working through
> > and fixed all ports issues identified by an exp-run (though openssl111
> > has given me more work). Which would you like to have as a default in a
> > post private kerberos base world? (I've tentatively set it to MIT in my
> > git tree.)
>
> If FreeBSD is choosing MIT over Heimdal in base, then it seems to me
> that we should choose MIT over Heimdal in ports, no?
One would think, which is why my to be proposed patch to ports will
prefer MIT over Heimdal. However I don't want to make any assumptions
about a port. Better to ask. This and the related src/ patch will
eventually become a phab review.
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX: <cy at FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list