svn commit: r472232 - in head/x11-toolkits/wxgtk31: . files

[Yuri]

On 06/13/18 02:28, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> If you just want to use wxWidgets for the port, you only need to set
>> USE_WX=3.1, and then use ${WX_CONFIG} and ${WXRC_CMD} to configure the
>> project. If some project hard-codes the config name executables, this
>> is a bug in that project.
> No, this is not the case, they use some API functions which are not
> available in 3.0, that's why I was not abale to update it before 3.1
> hit the tree.

wxWidgets API changed in 3.1, so you need to say USE_WX=3.1 instead of 
USE_WX=3.0. But, still, the only thing you do is to use USE_WX, 
${WX_CONFIG} and ${WXRC_CMD} in the ports that use wxWidgets.

>> Gtk2/Gtk3 choice is nicely abstracted away from the users, and there
>> should be no reason to break this abstraction and bring the gtk notion
>> into the ports using wxWidgets.
> I don't understand.  How do you mean?  Can I run wxWidgets ports without
> Gtk+ at all?


The choice of Gtk2 vs. Gtk3 is abstracted away, such that users don't 
need to know about it. This doesn't mean that Gtk itself can be 
eliminated, you just don't need to worry about such details.


Yuri