Re: 答复: svn commit: r441078 - head/sysutils/docker-freebsd

[Jov]

I did this as the offical doc say.It say I can submit pr for
non-maintained port to take over maintainership ,but do not mention
the patch to update the port(sure ,I will update this port,but this
need some time).May be the doc should be update?

I also take over some other ports pr: java/netty，sysutils/busybox
with update patch.also 4 new ports prs.

I am looking for a port mentor.Is there anyone can mentor me?

2017-05-17 21:56 GMT+08:00 Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com>:
> On 05/17/2017 06:25, wen heping wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> 发件人: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com>
>> 发送时间: 2017年5月17日 21:08
>> 收件人: Wen Heping; mat at freebsd.org
>> 抄送: ports-committers at freebsd.org; svn-ports-all at freebsd.org;
>> svn-ports-head at freebsd.org
>> 主题: Re: svn commit: r441078 - head/sysutils/docker-freebsd
>>
>>
>> In message <201705171115.v4HBFAhF086859 at repo.freebsd.org>, Wen Heping
>> writes:
>>>
>>> Author: wen
>>> Date: Wed May 17 11:15:09 2017
>>> New Revision: 441078
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/441078
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>    - Pass maintainership to submitter
>>>
>>>    PR:         219185
>>>    Submitted by:       amutu at amutu.com
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>    head/sysutils/docker-freebsd/Makefile
>>>
>>> Modified: head/sysutils/docker-freebsd/Makefile
>>>
>>> =============================================================================
>>> =
>>> --- head/sysutils/docker-freebsd/Makefile     Wed May 17 10:46:16 2017
>>>         (r441077)
>>> +++ head/sysutils/docker-freebsd/Makefile     Wed May 17 11:15:09 2017
>>>         (r441078)
>>> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ PORTNAME=     docker-freebsd
>>>   PORTVERSION= 20150625
>>>   CATEGORIES=  sysutils
>>>
>>> -MAINTAINER=  ports at FreeBSD.org
>>> +MAINTAINER=  amutu at amutu.com
>>>   COMMENT=     Docker containment system
>>>
>>>   LICENSE=     APACHE20
>>>
>>>
>> This is wrong. It used to be that someone would receive the maintainership
>> of a port by submitting a patch along with a maintainership request. I
>> know
>> this has been discussed before. Has the policy changed?
>>
>>
>> Seems I missed the discussion.
>> I shall contact the submitter about his plan of this port.
>>
>> wen
>>
>
> That's not for me to say, though my opinion is that it would cause more
> damage to revert. Maybe portmgr can weigh in on this.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
> FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org
>
>         The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
>
> _______________________________________________
> svn-ports-head at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-ports-head-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"