svn commit: r446864 - head/sysutils/py3-iocage

Bryan Drewery bdrewery at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jul 31 16:32:12 UTC 2017


On 7/31/2017 9:26 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/31/2017 3:28 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> On 7/31/17 8:07 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:03:35PM +0800, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
>>>> 2017-07-31 10:35 GMT+08:00 Kubilay Kocak <koobs at freebsd.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/31/17 11:16 AM, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-07-30 21:18 GMT+08:00 Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org
>>>>>> <mailto:adamw at adamw.org>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     > On 28 Jul, 2017, at 22:17, Marcelo Araujo <araujo at freebsd.org
>>>>>>     <mailto:araujo at freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > Author: araujo
>>>>>>     > Date: Sat Jul 29 04:17:31 2017
>>>>>>     > New Revision: 446864
>>>>>>     > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/446864
>>>>>>     <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/446864>
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > Log:
>>>>>>     >  - Update to 0.9.9.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     >  Changelog at: https://github.com/iocage/iocage/releases/tag/0.9.9
>>>>>>     <https://github.com/iocage/iocage/releases/tag/0.9.9>
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > Modified:
>>>>>>     >  head/sysutils/py3-iocage/Makefile
>>>>>>     >  head/sysutils/py3-iocage/distinfo
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > Modified: head/sysutils/py3-iocage/Makefile
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     ============================================================
>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>     > --- head/sysutils/py3-iocage/Makefile Sat Jul 29 04:00:56 2017
>>>>>>         (r446863)
>>>>>>     > +++ head/sysutils/py3-iocage/Makefile Sat Jul 29 04:17:31 2017
>>>>>>         (r446864)
>>>>>>     > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>>>>>     > # $FreeBSD$
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > PORTNAME=     iocage
>>>>>>     > -PORTVERSION= 0.9.8.1
>>>>>>     > +PORTVERSION= 0.9.9
>>>>>>     > CATEGORIES=   sysutils python
>>>>>>     > PKGNAMEPREFIX=        ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ BUILD_DEPENDS=
>>>>>>     ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pytest-runner>=2
>>>>>>     > RUN_DEPENDS=  ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}click>=6.7:devel/py3-click \
>>>>>>     >               ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}tqdm>=4.10.0:misc/py3-tqdm \
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>      ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}coloredlogs>0:devel/py3-coloredlogs \
>>>>>>     > +
>>>>>>      ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}verboselogs>0:devel/py-verboselogs \
>>>>>>     >               ca_root_nss>0:security/ca_root_nss \
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>      ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}texttable>=0.8.7:textproc/py3-texttable \
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>      ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pytest-runner>=2.0.0:devel/py3-pytest-runner
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Hi Marcelo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     There is no py36-verboselogs package. You'll need to create a
>>>>>>     py3-verboselogs port, because right now only py27-verboselogs gets
>>>>>>     built.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     See the build failure at
>>>>>>     http://beefy10.nyi.freebsd.org/data/110i386-default/
>>>>> 446906/logs/py36-iocage-0.9.9.log
>>>>>>     <http://beefy10.nyi.freebsd.org/data/110i386-default/
>>>>> 446906/logs/py36-iocage-0.9.9.log>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     # Adam
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     --
>>>>>>     Adam Weinberger
>>>>>>     adamw at adamw.org <mailto:adamw at adamw.org>
>>>>>>     https://www.adamw.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can't add py3 ports because soon we gonna have FLAVORS!
>>>>>> I can build iocage if I define the python version on my make.conf,
>>>>>> however I can see the issue with poudriere.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since this port already uses py3-* (workaround) ports for dependencies
>>>>> and there is no known ETA for VARIANTS support in ports, and the port is
>>>>> broken without py3-verboselogs, it should be created.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, py-iocage should be resurrected, py-iocage was incorrectly deleted
>>>>> [1] instead of this one when it moved to Python 3.x only support. py3-*
>>>>> ports are only for (temporary) dependencies
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/445459
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How I can pass the pre-commit hook that blocks any add of py3 slave ports?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>
>>> FLAVORS are in review and finished, poudriere is able to deal with them -devel.
>>>
>>> The commit is pending exp-run, documentation etc. It takes time as it is a major
>>> change in the framework with huge impact.
>>>
>>> py3-* were a hack in the first place that should never have been done, they
>>> addition made it more complicated to work on FLAVORS, adding more and by passing
>>> the hook would just give even more delay for FLAVORS to be committed.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bapt
>>>
>>
>> Existing ports (particularly popular ports like iocage) that already
>> rely on these dependencies should be allowed continue to work. The block
>> relies on the assumption that new dependencies for existing and working
>> ports will never be needed, which is the case here.
>>
>> The block on new py3-* ports (while noone likes them) was and is
>> premature, and is even more so without an alternative, and it was
>> heavy-handed. Developers were already trying hard to minimise their use.
>>
>> The block should be removed, and can be re-added when the official
>> package builders are running with the poudriere "special feature"
>> version that builds py3-* versions of py- ports automatically, or ports
> 
> I'm not quite awake yet so pardon the terseness.  I will start a
> poudriere-devel exp-run now and then push it out to the builders
> following that in the next 2 days.  That will allow py3- dependencies to
> build properly.  It would allow existing py3- leaf ports to build as well.
> 
> As for py3- leaf ports I would allow them but they have to follow strict
> criteria:
> - They must be named category/py3-foo
> - They must be a *slave* port to a category/py-foo
> - They must be supported on all python versions, not just 3.4+ or
> something odd like that.
> 
> The FLAVORS support in Poudriere is done. What is held up is an exp-run
> that I'm tasked with and various bugs/documentation/more exp-runs.
> Every new py3- port added that doesn't follow those rules means we have
> to change Poudriere again.  I think the criteria above is reasonable but
> I know the last one is problematic.
> 
> I've said on IRC before but not sure I have here, that py3- ports beyond
> the fixed cases above, are only useful for generating a leaf package for
> users to download.  They can still build category/py-foo as PYTHON3
> today though.  So there is an alternative but it is just not
> package-friendly yet.

Also this is only true for 'bulk -a'.  If a user is using 'bulk cat/foo1
cat/foo2 cat/foo3' then they don't need the py3- stuff at all with
poudriere-devel.
- Use python default version = 2
- Add fake py3 ports into bulk list: devel/py3-foo (so long as
devel/py-foo exists then py3-foo will work, even py33-foo py34-foo, etc)

> 
> About the block being premature, I will agree that what was lacking was
> a communication about it to a wider community and an override allowed
> with Portmgr review.  At the time I wasn't quite sure what the criteria
> for an override would even be.  Now that I understand it more and have
> Poudriere being a bit smarter than my first implementation, I will tweak
> the block to allow a Portmgr override.
> 
>> variants supports lands, whichever one comes first. If that's in 3 days,
>> great, if its in 3 weeks or 2 months, our developers have been allowed
>> to keep the status quo working.
>>
>> Users are currently being impacted where there is no alternative and
>> they should not be asked to pay that price for our dislike of py3-* ports.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Koobs
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20170731/481aa766/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list