svn commit: r421549 - in head: . Mk

[Kubilay Kocak]

On 9/09/2016 4:26 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> In both case that means there is NO license and then we should not distribute
> them at all.

There are cases where software has no license, the author says so, but
they mean, and/or say 'free to do with what you please'. This is neither
NONE, nor undefined (in terms of the 'terms'), nor PD, nor 'empty(LICENSE)'.