svn commit: r388648 - in head/net: asterisk11 asterisk13

Kubilay Kocak koobs at FreeBSD.org
Tue Nov 10 07:27:15 UTC 2015


On 9/11/2015 11:01 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Looking at the above I'd vouch for "Build with current GCC" which

My guess/feeling is the word current is at a minimum confusing and at
worse misleading/wrong.

Second, I don't think it's necessary to specify what is ultimately only
a ports framework implementation detail, in the description itself.

What is the benefit to the user?

* Have foo built with <X> versus whatever it built with without this
option enabled



More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list