svn commit: r383538 - head/databases/sqlitemanager

[Mikhail T.]

On 07.04.2015 17:20, John Marino wrote:
> Okay, so you "save" the port that was going to be deleted, but since you
> did it against standards, you then suggest that I clean up after you
> because I pointed out the mistake?  (the same that that was just pointed
> out in heavy fashion last week).
Yes, I do think it is better to save a port imperfectly, than to let it expire
for a silly reason. The port is now better, than it was. If it can be improved
further, you are welcome to it.
> (there it was said *NEVER* use CP to install files, so obviously what
> you did is not fine.)
I don't know, John, what your expectations are of the fellow ports-maintainers,
but I'm not going to review archives of mailing lists every time I do a commit.
If portlint and other automated checks I'm aware of are happy, then so am I.

Thank you for your time.

    -mi