svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el

Emanuel Haupt ehaupt at critical.ch
Mon Mar 10 14:43:11 UTC 2014


Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:16:59PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else
> > ever felt the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated?
> > Just to avoid having to skim through commit logs.
> 
> It's getting a bit ridiculuos, no?
>
> Guys, nothing was discussed thus far which does not come naturally
> from common sense.  Certainly there are few special cases that
> require deeper analysis (e.g. proper, legally-clean LICENSE
> handling), but from what I see, most of "please don't/do
> this-or-that" stuff comes from negligence rather than deliberate
> dissent from PHB or common practices.  If every committer would
> review *entire* Makefile before 'svn ci', there would be presumably
> less messages on the lists. :)

This is rediculous. I am currently trying to bring down the count of
unstaged ports. If I see things right away I will fix them with it but
asking me/us to fix EVERY possible flaw is like saying: Just because
you fix the tire you're responsible to fix every other part of the car.

Emanuel


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list