svn commit: r338802 - in head/textproc: docbook-241 docbook-300 docbook-310 docbook-400 docbook-410 docbook-440 docbook-450 docbook-500 docbook-xml-450
Mathieu Arnold
mat at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jan 6 14:22:08 UTC 2014
+--On 5 janvier 2014 17:21:23 +0000 Jason Helfman <jgh at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
| Log:
| - fix pkgname collisions
| -LATEST_LINK= docbook-241
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= docbook-300
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= docbook-310
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= docbook-400
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= docbook-410
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= ${PORTNAME}-440
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= ${PORTNAME}-450
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
| -LATEST_LINK= ${PORTNAME}-500
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PKGORIGIN:T:S/docbook-//}
Why the overly complicated computation where you could just have put the
number that was in the LATEST_LINK right away ?
Those ports version will never change, so it's not likely that anyone will
ever have to update the PKGNAMESUFFIX.
| -LATEST_LINK= ${PORTNAME}-450
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PORTVERSION:S/.//}
| -LATEST_LINK= ${PORTNAME}-440
| +PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${PORTVERSION:S/.//}
And there, why the change of heart ? Now, we have a package named
docbook440 and one named docbook-xml44, which is rather not consistent at
all.
Regards,
--
Mathieu Arnold
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list