svn commit: r303725 - in head: deskutils/virt-manager devel/libvirt-java devel/p5-Sys-Virt net-mgmt/virt-viewer net-mgmt/virtinst net-mgmt/zenpack-libvirt sysutils/cfengine-devel sysutils/cfengine33

Beat Gätzi beat at
Wed Sep 5 22:48:33 UTC 2012

On Sep 6, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:24:28PM -0700, Doug Barton thus spake:
>> On 09/05/2012 14:48, Jason Helfman wrote:
>>> Author: jgh
>>> Date: Wed Sep  5 21:48:20 2012
>>> New Revision: 303725
>>> URL:
>>> Log:
>>>  - follow r303724 shlib bump of libvirt
>> As has been discussed before, please do these commits at the same time.
>> In the theoretical future where we might need to merge them to a stable
>> ports branch, it's easier to merge 1 than 2; and there are no
>> circumstances where we would revert just one or the other.
>> Doug
> I've asked this before this commit several times, and there was no general
> consensus. It was also suggested that I follow the method in which I did
> perform the commit.
> While I do agree with you, if this is what we should be doing, this should
> be documented accordingly by portmgr.

The Ports Subversion Primer already document this in the "Editing and
Committing" section.


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list