svn commit: r53194 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal

[Warner Losh]

Author: imp
Date: Tue Jun 25 23:43:42 2019
New Revision: 53194
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/53194

Log:
  Add BSD-Patent to the list of OK, but approval required licenses.
  
  The EDK2 project has migrated to the BSD-Patent license from
  https://opensource.org/licenses/BSDplusPatent for much of their code
  base. Get pre-approval for future imports from EDK2 and be explicit
  about needing core approval for new components.
  
  Reviewed by:	allanjude@, bcr@, brooks@, seanc@
  Approved by:	core@
  Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20761

Modified:
  head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml

Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml
==============================================================================
--- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml	Tue Jun 25 19:46:39 2019	(r53193)
+++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml	Tue Jun 25 23:43:42 2019	(r53194)
@@ -79,11 +79,23 @@
 	  License licensed components or the change of license of
 	  existing components to the Apache License.</p>
 
-	<p>The following components are currently approved:</p>
+	<p>This license is approved for the following components:<p>
 	<ul>
 	  <li>LLVM toolchain and (with LLVM Exceptions) runtime
 	    components.</li>
 	  <li>Subversion and its dependencies</li>
+	</ul>
+      </li>
+
+      <li>
+	<p>The BSD+Patent License is acceptable for use in some cases.
+	  The Core Team must approve the import of new BSD+Patent
+	  License licensed components or the change of license of
+	  existing components to the BSD+Patent License.</p>
+
+	<p>This license is approved for the following components:<p>
+	<ul>
+	  <li>EDK2 derived code related to UEFI functionality</li>
 	</ul>
       </li>