svn commit: r47674 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd

Rene Ladan rene at
Mon Oct 26 21:12:44 UTC 2015

Author: rene
Date: Mon Oct 26 21:12:42 2015
New Revision: 47674

  - remove a broken link to an article in the Wall Street Journal [1]
  - while here do not call March 2000 "recent"
  This article needs more updating.
  Submitted by:	Ruben Klink on freebsd-doc [1]


Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml
--- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml	Mon Oct 26 12:04:42 2015	(r47673)
+++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.xml	Mon Oct 26 21:12:42 2015	(r47674)
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
 	  the vendor of BSD/386, alleging that the product contained
 	  AT&T-copyrighted code.  The case was settled out of court in
 	  1994, but the spectre of the litigation continues to haunt people.
-	  As recently as March 2000 an article published on the web claimed
+	  In March 2000 an article published on the web claimed
 	  that the court case had been <quote>recently settled</quote>.</para>
 	<para>One detail that the lawsuit did clarify is the naming: in the
@@ -218,15 +218,6 @@
 	    system</quote> and <quote>the 4.4BSD operating
-      <listitem>
-	<para>There is a perception that the BSD projects are fragmented and
-	  belligerent.  The
-	  <link xlink:href="">Wall Street
-	    Journal</link> spoke of <quote>balkanization</quote> of the
-	  BSD projects.  Like the law suit, this perception bases mainly
-	  on ancient history.</para>
-      </listitem>

More information about the svn-doc-all mailing list