svn commit: r41824 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook

Dru Lavigne dru.lavigne at
Mon Jun 3 14:41:34 UTC 2013

> > I agree that it was a good choice that time but the
> two-way merges add 
> > quite much overhead. When the branch was created, we
> still didn't have a 
> > real XML toolchain. But now we have it so DocBook
> profiling is possible. 
> > In this way, we can work with a single source and mark
> up print-only and 
> > online-only sections. We can also mark up
> version-specific text so there 
> > is no need to maintain two different development
> lines.
> > 
> > Gabor
> This sounds really cool, I think we should have a
> discussion
> on how to do this, if we want to do this, and how we could
> go about using only one version.  Personally, I kind of
> like
> a development version where we can make changes, discuss
> them,
> fix them, as a team, and have them slowly merged into a
> version
> that will appear on the web.  :)

This is a good item to add to the agenda for the June 17 doc sprint. Tom, will you be attending that one in person (in Cincinnati?) or online?



More information about the svn-doc-all mailing list