PERFORCE change 162206 for review

[John Baldwin]

On Monday 18 May 2009 10:07:01 am Zhao Shuai wrote:
> Yes, that is an elegant solution and I will do that.
> What's your opinion, John?
> 
> This week I just wanna make fifo work using the existing
> pipe code, so current modification in pipe code looks ugly.
> But I think it helps me to figure out which part of pipe code
> can be shared.

I agree with both counts.

> 2009/5/17 Attilio Rao <attilio at freebsd.org>
> 
> >
> > I'm not sure how do you and John want to organize the work, but when I
> > was thinking about it my main idea was firstly to refactorize the pipe
> > code, identifying common parts that can be shared and put under
> > subr_something.c (for example) to be sucked in by both pipes and FIFOs
> > main code.
> >
> >
> -- 
> Regards,
> Zhao
> 



-- 
John Baldwin