PERFORCE change 166094 for review

[Ana Kukec]

http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=166094

Change 166094 by anchie at anchie_malimis on 2009/07/14 18:30:10

	In RTM_SND message, rtm->rtm_addrs is set to 0, but routing message is 
	still checked against rti_info[RTAX_DST] == NULL. Skip this check in 
	case of RTM_SND message.	

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/soc2009/anchie_send/src/sys/net/rtsock.c#7 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/soc2009/anchie_send/src/sys/net/rtsock.c#7 (text+ko) ====

@@ -501,11 +501,15 @@
 		senderr(EINVAL);
 	}
 	info.rti_flags = rtm->rtm_flags;
-	if (info.rti_info[RTAX_DST] == NULL ||
-	    info.rti_info[RTAX_DST]->sa_family >= AF_MAX ||
-	    (info.rti_info[RTAX_GATEWAY] != NULL &&
-	     info.rti_info[RTAX_GATEWAY]->sa_family >= AF_MAX))
-		senderr(EINVAL);
+	if (rtm->rtm_type != RTM_SND) {
+		if (info.rti_info[RTAX_DST] == NULL ||
+	    		info.rti_info[RTAX_DST]->sa_family >= AF_MAX ||
+	    		(info.rti_info[RTAX_GATEWAY] != NULL &&
+	     		info.rti_info[RTAX_GATEWAY]->sa_family >= AF_MAX)) {
+			printf("EINVAL 3");
+			senderr(EINVAL);
+		}
+	}
 	/*
 	 * Verify that the caller has the appropriate privilege; RTM_GET
 	 * is the only operation the non-superuser is allowed.
@@ -519,6 +523,9 @@
 	switch (rtm->rtm_type) {
 		struct rtentry *saved_nrt;
 
+	case RTM_SND:
+		printf("RTM_SND!");
+
 	case RTM_ADD:
 		if (info.rti_info[RTAX_GATEWAY] == NULL)
 			senderr(EINVAL);