PERFORCE change 171338 for review

[Rafal Jaworowski]

On 2009-12-03, at 18:00, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:

> Since this is the same as the OFW interface, or is supposed to be, would it make sense to make this be MI in /sys/dev/ofw, attaching with a low priority to any device with a phandle and OF children?

The end goal is something like this, yes -- I want to get it initially working with FDT and in the next round we can optimize/merge it into something generic that suits all OF cases. If you have any particular comments or insight let me know, comments are greatly welcome.

Rafal