PERFORCE change 111336 for review

[Attilio Rao]

2006/12/9, Paolo Pisati <piso at freebsd.org>:
> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111336
>
> Change 111336 by piso at piso_newluxor on 2006/12/09 17:25:17
>
>        Add a private per handler ithread for every filtered driver.

Nice shot.
When piso@ and I spoke about this I was suggested, if empirically we
see a possible form of parallelism not happening too seldomly for the
handlers, to use group of handlers which can run concurrently and to
give a kthread for any group.
The "split & group" operation might be done by the driver developer
and I don't really know if it is worth it.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein