PERFORCE change 68352 for review

[John Baldwin]

http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=68352

Change 68352 by jhb at jhb_slimer on 2005/01/05 22:21:05

	Committed.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/smpng/sys/notes#28 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/smpng/sys/notes#28 (text+ko) ====

@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@
   buys is being able to swi_sched() from a fast handler, but that doesn't
   make sense because you can't actually enqueue a task onto its queue from
   a fast interrupt context
-- Optimize spin locks on UP such that they don't do atomic operations
-  - Untested
-  - Unbenchmarked
 - Try to fix problems with stuck IPIs by raising TPR and enabling interrupts
   in spin loops.  Need to perhaps generalize this so that critical sections
   do this.  That really needs to only be done in spinlock_*() (and maybe some