i915 intel_frontbuffer_put panic, patch for review/testing

[Pete Wright]

On 1/31/21 12:20 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 22:39, Pete Wright <pete at nomadlogic.org> wrote:
>> On 1/28/21 5:49 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
>>> I've backported the patch and applied it against the 5.4-lts branch in
>>> the drm-kmod repo, and the issue has not recurred. My patch is in a
>>> pull request at [3], and available as a patch file at [4]. Review
>>> and/or testing is very much appreciated.
>> I would be happy to test on my laptop running 13, is there an easy way
>> to download a branch and have it build using the ports infrastructure?
>>    I believe ports using github for distfiles expect a tag not branch.  i
>> can test out building it locally outside of the ports tree, but wanted
>> to see if i could be lazy first :)
> I hacked the drm-fbsd13-kmod port to build my snapshot; you can use
> https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/tree/drm-kmod-issue-49 or just
> apply the change
> https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/commit/1f54b67ad4b1ef93071f3d285a72f7cd8302a7ab.
>
> It looks like GH_TAGNAME indeed does not expect a branch, but a hash
> is permissible.
Awesome, thanks Ed.  An of course it makes sense now about GH_TAGNAME 
taking a hash since tags are just pointers to a specific hash as I 
understand git :)  Testing now and will report any issues that pop up.

-pete

-- 
Pete Wright
pete at nomadlogic.org
@nomadlogicLA