[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239682

--- Comment #36 from Jan Beich <jbeich at FreeBSD.org> ---
Only Mesa because it will remain stuck on llvm80 for years due to complications
with QA and build system. I don't think anything else can affect Gnome. If you
find more regressions, please, report.

Binary package estimates:
/latest around Saturday evening. Delays mainly come from ports r513733 and
ports r513734.
/quarterly around Sunday morning as previous build hasn't finished yet.

(In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #33)
Bug noise is a good argument. I'll think of a solution e.g., splitting into
many bugs, removing CC after approval, mailing off-bug.

"typical pkg set" argument is double-edged, sacrificing many for the few. If
LLVM_DEFAULT is too old (e.g., misses some C++20 stuff or has bugs only fixed
in later version) it may lead to individual ports hardcoding llvm versions.
However, some like Mesa can avoid RUN_DEPENDS by statically linking.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.