mesa-dri uses llvm60

[Charlie Li]

On 12/01/2019 12:06, Robert Huff wrote:
> 
> Andreas Nilsson writes:
> 
>>  On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 5:25 PM Daniel Eischen wrote:
>   
>>   >      Just thinking out loud, can the missing llvm bits be a port,
>>   >      such that building the missing pieces use what's already
>>   >      in base?
>>  
>>  It probably could, at least technically. But it would probably not
>>  be a good idea, having some bits in / and some bits in
>>  /usr/local. Also, if a newer mesa-dri would depend on a newer llvm
>>  than whats in base, that would prohibit any update to mesa-dri.
> 
> 	Could it be an _optional_ part of base, perhaps controlled by
> "WITH_LLVM_EXTRAS=yes" in src.conf?
> 
No on all counts. The LLVM ports are absolutely needed.

https://wiki.freebsd.org/WhyDoIHaveToBuildLLVMWhenIAlreadyHaveClangInstalled
(wiki page courtesy of brooks@)

-- 
Charlie Li
Can't think of a witty .sigline today…

(This email address is for mailing list use only; replace local-part
with vishwin for off-list communication)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/attachments/20190112/5123a8ee/attachment.sig>